Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages 12-19 (January 2003)

3 of 18

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT + REFS

FULL-TEXT PDF (160 KB)

Improvement of asthma control with a breath-actuated pressurised metred dose inhaler (BAI): a prescribing claims study of 5556 patients using a traditional pressurised metred dose inhaler (MDI) or a breath-actuated device

Received 1 March 2002; accepted 3 July 2002.

Abstract

A relationship has been reported between sub-optimal inhaler technique and control of asthma symptoms. Randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews may fail to accurately represent this relationship, by excluding patients who are unable to correctly use the reviewed devices. Breath actuated inhalers (BAIs) are reported to be easier to use than metered dose inhalers (MDIs). This study uses a large primary care medical record database (DIN-LINK) to examine the ‘real-life’ clinical effectiveness of a BAI vs. traditional MDIs. A comparison is made between the quantity of asthma-related medication (β2 agonist, oral steroids and antibiotics) and healthcare resource use required by children (0–12 years) and adults (13+ years) using either the BAI or an MDI over a 12-month period. Out of 5556 new asthma patients who met the inclusion criteria, 306 used a BAI and 5250 used a traditional MDI. Children and adults using the BAI received fewer prescriptions for all three medication types than those using a traditional MDI (children:β2 agonists −18% P=0.036, oral steroids −88% P<0.05, antibiotics –68% P<0.05 and adults: β2 agonists −10.9%P =0.179, oral steroids −51.2% P<0.05, antibiotics −19.5%P =0.276). All prescription results reached statistical significance, with the exception ofβ2 agonist and antibiotic prescription numbers for adult patients. Children and adults using the BAI required less GP consultations for asthma (children −30.3%, P<0.05 and adults −22.9%,P <0.05) and less GP consultations for respiratory infections than those using a traditional MDI (children −35.2%, P -0.001 and adults −10.4%, P=0.236). Adults using the BAI required less outpatient appointments than adults using an MDI (−43.7%, P=0.166). All non-prescription resource results reached statistical significance with the exception of GP consultations for respiratory infections and outpatient visits in the adult group. In conclusion, children and adults using the BAI appear to have better asthma control than children and adults using an MDI as evidenced by fewer relief medication prescriptions and less healthcare resource use.

Keywords: inhaler, asthma, breath-actuated, beclomethasone, β2 agonists, salbutamol, control, resource use, Easi-Breathe®

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

Article Outline

• Abstract

• References

• Copyright

References

REFERENCES

1. 1 Asthma J. 2001;6:.

2. 2 Price DB, Ryan D, Pearce L. The AIR study. Asthma J. 1999;4:74–78.

3. 3 Rabe KF, Vermeire PA, Soriano JB. Clinical management of asthma in 1999: the Asthma Insights and Reality Europe (AIRE) study. Eur Respir. 2000;16:802–807.

4. 4 Morice AH. The role of the asthma nurse in treatment compliance and self-management following hospital admission. Respir Med. 2001;95:851–856. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (292 KB) | CrossRef

5. 5 Ward M. Asthma education-where now?. Respir Med. 2001;95:849–850. Full-Text PDF (96 KB) | CrossRef

6. 6 Bousquet J. Global initiative for asthma (GINA) and its objectives. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30:2–5. CrossRef

7. 7 Von Mutius E. Presentation of new GINA guidelines for paediatrics. The Global Initiative on Asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30:6–10. CrossRef

8. 8 Thorax. 1997;52:S2.

9. 9 Milgrom H, Bender B. Nonadherence to asthma treatment and failure of therapy. Curr Opin Pediatr. 1997;9:590–595. MEDLINE

10. 10 Milgrom H, Bender B, Ackerson L. Noncompliance and treatment failure in children with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996;98:1051–1057. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (517 KB) | CrossRef

11. 11 Roche N, Huchon G. Rationale for the choice of an aerosol delivery system. J Aerosol Med. 2000;13:393–404. MEDLINE | CrossRef

12. 12 Osman LM, Friend JA, Legge JS. Requests for repeat medication prescriptions and frequency of acute episodes in asthma patients. J Asthma. 1999;36:449–457. MEDLINE | CrossRef

13. 13 Cimas JE, Arce MC, Gonzalez ME. Factors related with the morbidity of asthma. Broncopneumology. 1997;33:389–394.

14. 14 Gonda I, Schuster JA, Rubsamen RM. Inhalation delivery systems with compliance and disease management capabilities. J Control release. 1998;30:269–274. CrossRef

15. 15 Lahdensuo A, Muittari A. Bronchodilator effects of a fenoterol metered dose inhaler and fenoterol powder in asthmatics with poor inhaler technique. Eur J Respir Dis. 1986;68:332–335. MEDLINE

16. 16 Lindgren D, Blake B, Larrson S. Clinical consequences of inadequate inhalation technique in asthma. Eur J Respir Dis. 1987;70:93–98. MEDLINE

17. 17 Newman SP. Aerosol deposition considerations in inhalation therapy. Chest. 1985;88:152s–160s. CrossRef

18. 18 Hoskins G, McGowan C, Neville R. Risk factors and costs associated with an asthma attack. Thorax. 2000;24–55.

19. 19 Duerden M, Price D. Training issues in the use of inhalers. Dis Manage Health Outcomes. 2001;9:75–87.

20. 20 Shrestha M, Parupia H, Andrews B. Metered dose inhaler technique of patients in an urban ED: prevalence of incorrect technique and attempt at education. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14:380–384. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (491 KB) | CrossRef

21. 21 Kamps AW, Van Ewijk B, Roorda RJ. Poor inhalation technique even after inhalation instructions, in children with asthma. Pediatric Pulmonol. 2000;29:39–42.

22. 22 Newman SP. Improvement of drug delivery with a breath actuated pressurised aerosol for patients with poor inhaler technique. Thorax. 1991;46:712–726. MEDLINE | CrossRef

23. 23 Zanon P. Inhalation anti-asthma therapy with spacers:technical aspects. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1994;49:258–264. MEDLINE

24. 24 George M. A comprehensive educational program improves clinical outcome measures in inner-city patients with asthma. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1710–1716. MEDLINE | CrossRef

25. 25 Brocklebank D, Ram F, Wright J. Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:.

26. 26 Brocklebank D, Wright J, Cates C. Systematic review of clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers versus other hand held inhaler devices for delivering corticosteroids in asthma. BMJ. 2001;323:901–911.

27. 27 Ram F, Wright J, Brocklebank D. Systematic review of clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers versus other hand held inhaler devices for delivering B2 agonists bronchodilators in asthma. BMJ. 2001;323:896–900.

28. 28 Lipworth BJ. Patients can't use pMDI's in real life. BMJ Online. October 2001;21:.

29. 29 Williams I. Cheapest is best?. BMJ online. 2001, 25 October;.

30. 30 Senn S. Meta-analysis: more stress on analysis please. BMJ Online. 2001, October 27;.

31. 31 Price DB, Pearce L, Powell SR. Handling and acceptability of the Easi-Breathe device compared with a conventional metered dose inhaler by patients and practice nurses. Int J Clin Practice. 1999;53:31–36.

32. 32 Lenney J, Innes A, Crompton GK. Inappropriate inhaler use: assessment of use and patient preference of seven inhalation devices. Respir Med. 2000;94:496–500. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (119 KB) | CrossRef

33. 33 Chapman KR, Love L, Brubaker HA. Comparison of BAI's and conventional metered dose inhalation rechniques in elderly subjects. Chest. 1993;104:1332–1337. MEDLINE | CrossRef

34. 34 Hampson NB, Mueller MP. Reduction in patient timing errors using a breath-activated metered dose inhaler. Chest. 1994;106:462–465. MEDLINE | CrossRef

35. 35 Hilton S. An audit of inhaler technique among asthma patients of 34 general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1990;40:505–506. MEDLINE

36. 36 Hendry A, Coote J, Black H. Comparison of conventional metered dose inhaler with breath actuated metered dose inhaler in elderly patients. Int J Clin Pract. 1995;3:115–118.

37. 37 Reesor Nimmo CJ. Assessment of patients acceptance and inhalation technique of a pressurized aerosol inhaler and two breath-actuated devices. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27:922–927. MEDLINE

38. 38 Campbell LM. A comparison of the efficacy of long-acting a2-agonists: eformoterol via Turbohaler and salmeterol via pressurized metered dose inhaler or Accuhaler, in mild to moderate asthmatics. Res Med. 1999;93:224–236.

39. 39 DIN-Link database, Compufile Ltd. www.compufile.co.uk

40. 40 Warner JO. Review of prescribed treatment for children with asthma in 1990. BMJ. 1995;311:663–666.

41. 41 ACORN scoring system, CACI ltd. www.caci.co.uk

42. 42 Garrett J, Turner P. The severity of asthma in relation to beta agonist prescribing. N Z Med J. 1991;104:39–40. MEDLINE

43. 43 Fayon M, Just J, Thien H. Bacterial flora of the lower respiratory tract in children with bronchial asthma. Acta Paediatr. 1999;88:1216–1222. MEDLINE | CrossRef

44. 44 Glezen WP, Greenberg SB, Atmar RL. Impact of respiratory virus infections on persons with chronic underlying conditions. JAMA. 2000;283:499–505. MEDLINE | CrossRef

45. 45 Paramesh H. Practical approach to recurrent respiratory infections. Indian J Pediatr. 1996;63:181–187. MEDLINE | CrossRef

46. 46 LAIA, Prevalence of asthma treated in general practice, Lung and Asthma Information Agency factsheet 99/1, www.sghms.ac.uk, 1999

a Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2AY, U.K.

b Abacus International, Bicester, Oxon, U.K.

c IVAX Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd. Albert Basin, Royal Docks, London, U.K.

f1 Correspondence should be addressed to: David Price, General Practice Airways Group Professor of Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Health Centre, Westburn Road, Aberdeen AB25 2AY, U.K. Fax: +44 1224 550683; E-mail: d.price@abdn.ac.uk

PII: S0954-6111(02)91426-5

doi:10.1053/rmed.2002.1426

3 of 18