Journal Home
Search for

Volume 100, Issue 9, Pages 1633-1641 (September 2006)


View previous. 20 of 30 View next.

Humidity influences exercise capacity in subjects with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB)

T. StensrudaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, S. Berntsena, K.-H. Carlsenab

Received 4 October 2005; accepted 5 December 2005. published online 01 February 2006.

Summary 

Rationale

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) increases in cold and dry air and decreases in humid air in subjects with asthma. Few reports have reported on the effect of humid environment upon exercise capacity in subjects with EIB.

Objective

The primary aim of the present study was to examine the effect of changing the humidity of the environmental air upon exercise capacity measured by peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2 peak), peak ventilation (V˙Epeak) and peak running speed (peak) and secondarily to assess the influence of environmental humidity upon EIB in subjects suffering from EIB.

Methods

Twenty subjects (10–45 years old, male/female:13/7) with diagnosed EIB performed exercise testing under standardised, regular environmental conditions, 20.2°C (±1.1) and 40% (±3.3) relative humidity [mean (±sd)], and under standardised humid environmental conditions; 19.9°C (±1.0) and 95% (±1.7) relative humidity in random order on separate days. Lung function was measured before and 1, 3, 6, 10 and 15min after exercise. Heart rate (HR), oxygen uptake (V˙O2), respiratory gas exchange ratio (RER), breathing frequency (BF) and minute ventilation (V˙E) were measured during exercise.

Results

V˙O2 peak and peak increased significantly from 40% to 95% relative humidity of the environmental air, 4.5% and 5.9%, respectively (). HRpeak increased significantly in the humid environment, while BFpeak decreased significantly. RERpeak and V˙Epeak did not change significantly. Post-exercise reduction in FEV1 (ΔFEV1) and FEF50 (forced expiratory flow at 50% of FVC) (ΔFEF50) significantly decreased after exercise in a humid environment as compared to regular conditions, ΔFEV1: 12% (7,17) vs. 24% (19,29) [mean (95% confidence intervals)], respectively, ΔFEF50: 20% (12,29) vs. 38% (30,46), respectively (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Exercise capacity (V˙O2 peak and peak) markedly improved during exercise in humid air in subjects with EIB, whereas EIB was reduced to the half.

a Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, P.O. Box 4014 Ullevaal Stadion, NO-0806 Oslo, Norway

b Voksentoppen BKL, National Hospital (Rikshospitalet), Oslo, Norway

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +4723262346; fax: +4723408260.

 The study is performed within the ORAACLE (the Oslo Research group for Asthma and Allergy in Childhood; the Lung and Environment), which is member of the Ga2len, Network of Centers of Excellence.

PII: S0954-6111(05)00524-X

doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2005.12.001


View previous. 20 of 30 View next.