Respiratory Medicine
Volume 102, Issue 12 , Pages 1737-1743, December 2008

Sniff and Muller manoeuvres to measure diaphragmatic muscle strength

  • Hélène Prigent

      Affiliations

    • Service de Physiologie – Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, AP-HP, 92380 Garches, France
    • Centre d'Investigation Clinique – Innovations Technologiques, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, AP-HP, 92380 Garches, France
    • Université de Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, France
  • ,
  • David Orlikowski

      Affiliations

    • Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, AP-HP, 92380 Garches, France
    • Centre d'Investigation Clinique – Innovations Technologiques, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, AP-HP, 92380 Garches, France
    • Université de Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, France
  • ,
  • Christophe Fermanian

      Affiliations

    • Centre d'Investigation Clinique – Innovations Technologiques, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, AP-HP, 92380 Garches, France
    • Université de Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, France
  • ,
  • Michèle Lejaille

      Affiliations

    • Service de Physiologie – Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, AP-HP, 92380 Garches, France
    • Centre d'Investigation Clinique – Innovations Technologiques, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, AP-HP, 92380 Garches, France
    • Université de Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, France
  • ,
  • Line Falaize

      Affiliations

    • Service de Physiologie – Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, AP-HP, 92380 Garches, France
    • Université de Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, France
  • ,
  • Alain Louis

      Affiliations

    • Service de Physiologie – Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, AP-HP, 92380 Garches, France
    • Université de Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, France
  • ,
  • Brigitte Fauroux

      Affiliations

    • Pediatric Pulmonary Department, Hôpital Armand Trousseau, AP-HP, Paris, France
    • Inserm UMR-S 893, Équipe 12, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, 75012 Paris, France
  • ,
  • Frédéric Lofaso

      Affiliations

    • Service de Physiologie – Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, AP-HP, 92380 Garches, France
    • Centre d'Investigation Clinique – Innovations Technologiques, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, AP-HP, 92380 Garches, France
    • Université de Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, France
    • Inserm UMR 841, 94000 Créteil, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Service de Physiologie – Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, 92380 Garches, France. Tel.: +33 1 47 10 79 41; fax: +33 1 47 10 79 43.

Received 2 May 2008; accepted 3 July 2008. published online 19 August 2008.

Summary 

We hypothesized that peak values of oesophageal (Poes) and transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) swings during a maximal sniff manoeuvre and a maximal static inspiratory manoeuvre (Muller manoeuvre) are comparable or give complementary information for assessing diaphragmatic and global inspiratory muscle strength.

We studied 98 patients with suspected diaphragmatic dysfunction. Poes and Pdi swings were measured during maximal sniff manoeuvres (sniff), maximal Muller manoeuvres (max), and cervical magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (cervical Tw).

Eighty eight patients were able to perform both volitional manoeuvres. Among them, mean Poes sniff was significantly higher than mean Poes max (48.7±28.7cm H2O vs. 42.9±27.4cm H2O, p<0.05) and mean Pdi sniff was higher than mean Pdi max (49.2±35.1cm H2O vs. 42.9±33.3cm H2O, respectively, p=0.05). Cervical Pdi Tw correlated better with Pdi sniff (p<0.0001, r=0.62) than with Pdi max (p<0.0001, r=0.44). Poes and Pdi swings were greatest during the sniff manoeuvre in 42 patients (48%) and during the Muller manoeuvre in 29 patients (33%). Among the 17 remaining patients, nine had the greatest Poes swing during a maximal sniff manoeuvre and the greatest Pdi swing during a maximal static inspiratory manoeuvre; the opposite occurred in the other eight patients.

The combination of Muller manoeuvre and sniff manoeuvre increased the diagnosis of normal diaphragmatic strength from 18 patients (20%) to 21 patients (24%), and the additional analysis of cervical Pdi Tw further increased the diagnosis of normal diaphragmatic strength to 27 patients (31%).

In conclusion, though sniff manoeuvre gave significantly higher values than Muller manoeuvre, both volitional manoeuvres and cervical Pdi Tw are complementary and should be used in combination to evaluate diaphragmatic muscle strength.

Keywords: Diaphragm, Maximal inspiratory pressure, Maximal sniff manoeuvre, Isometric manoeuvre, Neuromuscular disease

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0954-6111(08)00246-1

doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2008.07.004

Respiratory Medicine
Volume 102, Issue 12 , Pages 1737-1743, December 2008