Journal Home
Search for

Volume 103, Issue 12, Pages 1796-1800 (December 2009)


View previous. 3 of 31 View next.

The role of EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis – comparisons with other bronchoscopic diagnostic modalities

Takahiro Nakajimaa, Kazuhiro YasufukubCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Katsushi Kurosuc, Yuichi Takiguchic, Taiki Fujiwaraa, Masako Chiyoa, Kiyoshi Shibuyaa, Kenzo Hiroshimad, Yukio Nakatanid, Ichiro Yoshinoa

Received 12 February 2009; accepted 26 July 2009. published online 13 August 2009.

Summary 

Background

The diagnosis of sarcoidosis requires both compatible clinical features and pathologic findings as a means to exclude other differential diagnoses. The utility of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for diagnosis of sarcoidosis has been reported, although its indication remains unclear for cases of suspicious sarcoidosis. To clarify the role of EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, we compared three diagnostic modalities: EBUS-TBNA, transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid analysis (BAL).

Methods

Thirty-eight patients with suspicious sarcoidosis who had enlarged hilar and/or mediastinal lymph nodes on chest CT were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with malignancies or prior established diagnosis of sarcoidosis were excluded. BAL was initially performed followed by TBLB and finally EBUS-TBNA at the same setting. Microbacterial examinations were also performed from all samples.

Results

Pathological findings compatible with sarcoidosis were obtained in 32 patients. The remaining 6 patients were diagnosed as one case each of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, atypical mycobacterial infection and tuberculosis, and the remaining three were pathologically indefinite cases. Clinically, 35 patients were diagnosed with sarcoidosis. The diagnostic accuracy of sarcoidosis was significantly better by EBUS-TBNA (91.4%, p<0.001) compared to the other two modalities. According to chest roentgenogram classifications, there were 31 stage I patients and 4 stage II patients. For stage I patients, EBUS-TBNA was significantly better (90.3%, p<0.001), but each modality showed 100% accuracy for stage II patients.

Conclusion

It is recommended that EBUS-TBNA is added to the conventional diagnostic modalities for patients with suspicious stage I sarcoidosis on chest roentgenogram.

a Department of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

b Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth St 9N-957, Toronto ON M5G 2C4, Canada

c Department of Respirology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

d Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 416 340 4290; fax: +1 416 340 3660.

PII: S0954-6111(09)00250-9

doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2009.07.013


View previous. 3 of 31 View next.