Respiratory Medicine
Volume 104, Issue 7 , Pages 957-965, July 2010

Asthma Programme in Finland: Did the use of secondary care resources become more rational?

  • L.E. Tuomisto

      Affiliations

    • Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Huhtalantie 53, FI 60220 Seinäjoki, Finland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +358408457163; fax: +35864154989.
  • ,
  • M. Erhola

      Affiliations

    • National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
  • ,
  • T. Luukkaala

      Affiliations

    • Science Centre, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere, Finland
    • Tampere School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
  • ,
  • H. Puolijoki

      Affiliations

    • Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Huhtalantie 53, FI 60220 Seinäjoki, Finland
  • ,
  • M.M. Nieminen

      Affiliations

    • University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
    • Koskiklinikka Medical Centre, Tampere, Finland
  • ,
  • M. Kaila

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland

Received 8 August 2009; accepted 27 January 2010. published online 08 March 2010.

Summary 

Objectives

The aims were to evaluate the profile of newly diagnosed adult asthma cases and the approach adopted to the secondary care management at the launch of the Finnish asthma programme in 1994 and seven years later, in 2001.

Methods

A retrospective medical record audit was made of non-acutely referred patients with asthma in 1994 (n=165) and in 2001 (n=133). Clinical profile data, numbers of out-patient visits and periods of in-patient care before and after asthma diagnosis were gathered from referral letters and secondary care records.

Results

The newly diagnosed asthma patients in 2001 were older, more obese and had more co-morbidities. The main asthma symptoms, such as dyspnoea, wheezing and cough, occurred equally in both years but were more often periodic than daily in 2001. Wheezing during auscultation was significantly less common in 2001. The diagnostic process was associated to a history of asthma in first-degree relatives (OR 5.34, 95% CI 1.12–24.49) in 1994 and a visit to a nurse prior to that to a physician (OR 3.13, 95% CI 1.17–8.37) in 2001. Secondary care visits per new case of asthma (7.3 in 1994 vs. 5.4 in 2001) and days in hospital (3.6 in 1994 vs. 0.95 in 2001) decreased significantly.

Conclusions

The profile of asthma diagnosed in secondary care indicates milder disease with more co-morbidities in 2001 than in 1994.Trends towards assigning a more active role on the part of primary care physicians and more rational use of secondary care resources in the management of asthma were found.

Keywords: Asthma symptoms, Management of asthma, Programme evaluation, Primary and secondary care interface, Referral

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0954-6111(10)00045-4

doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2010.01.018

Respiratory Medicine
Volume 104, Issue 7 , Pages 957-965, July 2010