This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
Abstract
Both in terms of morbidity and mortality, the therapeutic and organizational management of asthma pose a considerable and continuing challenge to healthcare delivery. One element in attempts to meet this challenge is the recognition of appropriate outcome measures to assess progress in tackling the burden of this disease. This study therefore aimed to assess pragmatically the effectiveness of a revised asthma morbidity index in identifying varying patterns of morbidity in U.K. general practices. A postal survey was conducted of 2762 patients believed to have or have had asthma from the lists of 12 general practices within the Eden Valley in Cumbria, using a questionnaire which combined the revised Jones morbidity index with questions on age, medication and perception of current asthma. Prescribing data were also recovered for 11 of the practices for the quarter within which the postal survey was conducted. Responses were obtained from 2123 subjects (77%), of whom 1474 (70%) believed themselves to be currently asthmatic. In this group, 18% reported low morbidity, 34% medium morbidity and 48% high morbidity. Age and inhaled steroid use were both positively and significantly associated with high morbidity. Those taking inhaled steroids were 1·4 times more likely to report high morbidity than those not taking steroids. The prescribed corticosteroid/bronchodilator ratio for cost was both negatively and significantly associated with high morbidity. The revised morbidity index is a simple tool of use in the surveillance of asthma in primary care. It identifies spectra of morbidity which vary between practices, which may be of use in assessing the quality of asthma care provided in the community.
Keywords
References
REFERENCES
- Correlates of asthma morbidity in primary care.BMJ. 1992; 304: 361-364
- Targeting asthma care in general practice using a morbidity index.BMJ. 1992; 304: 1353-1356
- Reducing asthma morbidity in the community: the effect of a targeted nurse-run asthma clinic in a North Lincolnshire general practice.Respir Med. 1997; 91: 634-640
- Predictive value of a simple asthma morbidity index in a general practice population.BJGP. 1999; 49: 23-26
- Medication, chronic illness and identity: the perspective of people with asthma.Soc Sci Med. 1997; 45: 189-201
- How to achieve better outcome in treatment of asthma in general practice.BMJ. 1993; 307: 1261-1263
- Observations on the structure, process and clinical outcomes of asthma care in general practice.BJGP. 1996; 46: 583-587
- Appropriate prescribing in asthma and its related cost in east London.BMJ. 1995; 310: 97-100
- Prescribing and hospital admissions in east London.BMJ. 1996; 312: 481-482
- Audit of the effect of a nurse run asthma clinic on workload and patient morbidity in a general practice.BJGP. 1991; 41: 227-231
- Asthma at the interface: bridging the gap between general practice and a district general hospital.Arch Dis Child. 1994; 70: 313-318
- Randomised comparison of guided self management and traditional treatment of asthma over one year.BMJ. 1996; 312: 748-752
- A self-management program for adult asthma. Part II: Cost-benefit analysis.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995; 95: 672-676
- A self-management program for adult asthma. Part I: Development and evaluation.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995; 95: 529-540
- Asthma self-management education program by home monitoring of peak expiratory flow.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995; 151: 353-359
- Community-based asthma care: trial of a “credit card” asthma self-management plan.Eur Respir J. 1994; 7: 1260-1265
- Proactive, nurse-run asthma care in general practice reduces asthma morbidity: scientific fact or medical assumption?.BJGP. 1995; 45: 497-499
- Peak flow based asthma self-management: a randomised controlled study in general practice. British Thoracic Society Research Committee.Thorax. 1995; 50: 851-857
- Measuring Clinical Outcome in Asthma—a Patient-focused Approach. Royal College of Physicians, London1999
Article info
Publication history
Accepted:
July 13,
2001
Received:
March 13,
2000
Identification
Copyright
© 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc.
User license
Elsevier user license | How you can reuse 
Elsevier's open access license policy
Elsevier user license
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article
Not Permitted
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
Elsevier's open access license policy
