Advertisement
Regular Article| Volume 95, ISSUE 12, P992-998, December 2001

Cost analysis of the use of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma: a 1-year follow-up

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      A retrospective cohort using pharmacy and medical claims was analysed to determine whether the differences in efficacy of various inhaled corticosteroids demonstrated in clinical trials lead to differences in costs of care observed in clinical practice. Subjects that had an ICD-9 (493.XX) code for asthma and a new pharmacy claim for inhaled fluticasone propionate 44 mcg (FP), beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), triamcinolone acetonide (TAA), budesonide (BUD) or flunisolide (FLU) were identified and followed for 12 months. Annual asthma care charges (pharmacy and medical) over the 12-month observation period were significantly (P<0·03) higher in patients treated with BDP, TAA, BUD and FLU compared to FP, 24%, 27%, 34% and 45% respectively. In addition, patients treated with BDP, TAA, and FLU were associated with significantly (P≤0·005) higher total healthcare (asthma + non-asthma) charges compared to patients on FP, 53%, 46% and 39% respectively. Asthma care and total healthcare charges remained lower for FP after including FP 110 mcg and excluding patients who were extreme cost outliers (±2 Math Eq from the mean) in a univariate sensitivity analysis. This analysis supports recent randomized control trials that FP offers a superior efficacy profile at lower asthma care as well as total healthcare charges compared to other inhaled corticosteroids.

      Keywords

      References

      REFERENCES

        • Weiss KB
        • Sullivan SD
        The health economics of asthma and rhinitis. I. Assessing the economic impact.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001; 107: 3-8
        • Stempel DA
        • Hedblom EC
        • Durcanin-Robbins JF
        • Sturm LL
        Pharmacy and medical claims database documents cost centers for 1993 annual asthma expenditures.
        Arch Fam Med. 1996; 5: 36-40
        • Donahue JG
        • Weiss ST
        • Livingston JM
        • Goetsch MA
        • Greineder DK
        • Platt R
        Inhaled steroids and the risk of hospitalization for asthma.
        JAMA. 1997; 277: 887-891
        • Wennnergren G
        • Kristjánsson S
        • Stannegård IL
        Decrease in hospitalizations for treatment of childhood asthma with increased use of anti-inflammatory treatment, despite an increase in the prevalence of asthma.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996; 97: 742-748
        • Goldman M
        • Rachmiel M
        • Gendler L
        • Katz Y
        Decrease in asthma mortality rate in Israel from 1991–1995: is it related to increased use of inhaled corticosteroids?.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000; 105: 71-74
        • Suissa S
        • Ernst P
        • Benayoun S
        • Baltzan M
        • Cai B
        Low-dose inhaled corticosteroids and the prevention of death from asthma.
        N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 332-336
      1. National Institutes of Health, Highlights of the Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma, Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute), 1997, 1, 50

        • Baraniuk J
        • Murray JJ
        • Nathan RA
        • Berger WE
        • Johnson M
        • Edwards LD
        • Srebro S
        • Rickard KA
        Fluticasone alone or in combination with salmeterol vs. triamcinolone in asthma.
        Chest. 1999; 116: 625-632
        • Raphael GD
        • Lanier RQ
        • Baker J
        • Edwards L
        • Rickard K
        • Lincourt WW
        A comparison of multiple doses of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate in subjects with persistent asthma.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999; 103: 796-803
        • Condemi JJ
        • Chervinsky P
        • Goldstein MF
        Fluticasone propionate powder administered through Diskhaler versus triamcinolone acetonide aerosol administered through metered-dose inhaler in patients with persistent asthma.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997; 100: 467-474
        • Pauwels RA
        • Yernault JC
        • Demedts MG
        • Geusens P
        Safety and efficacy of fluticasone and beclomethasone in moderate to severe asthma. Belgian Multicenter Study Group.
        Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 1998; 157: 827-832
        • Malo JL
        • Cartier A
        • Ghezzo H
        • Mark S
        • Brown J
        • Laviolette M
        • Boulet LP
        Skin bruising, adrenal function and markers of bone metabolism in asthmatics using inhaled beclomethasone and fluticasone.
        Eur Resp J. 1999; 13: 993-998
        • Bernstein DI
        • Berkowitz RB
        • Chervinsky P
        Dose-ranging study of a new steroid for asthma: mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler.
        Respir Med. 1999; 93: 603-612
        • Barnes NC
        • Hallett C
        • Harris TA
        Clinical experience with fluticasone propionate in asthma: A meta-analysis of efficacy and systemic activity compared with budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate at half the microgram dose or less.
        Respir Med. 1998; 92: 95-104
        • Corren J
        Intranasal corticosteroids for allergic rhinitis: how do different agents compare?.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999; 104: S144-149
        • Allen DB
        • Bronsky EA
        • LaForce CF
        Growth in asthmatic children treated with fluticasone propionate.
        J Pediatr. 1998; 132: 472-477
        • Ferguson AC
        • Spier S
        • Manjra A
        • Versteegh F GA
        • Mark S
        • Zhang P
        Efficacy and safety of high-dose inhaled steroids in children with asthma: A comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide.
        J Pediatr. 1999; 134: 422-427
        • Nielsen LP
        • Dahl R
        Therapeutic ratio of inhaled corticosteroids in adult asthma. A dose-range comparison between fluticasone propionate and budesonide, measuring their effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and adrenal cortex function.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 162: 2053-2057
        • Goldberg-Arnold R
        • Kotsanos JG
        • Motheral B
        Methodological issues in conducting pharmacoeconomic evaluations: Retrospective and claims database studies.
        Value in Health. 1999; 2: 82-87
        • Blaiss MS
        Outcomes analysis in asthma.
        JAMA. 1997; 278: 1874-1880
        • Guyatt G
        • Drummond M
        • Feeny D
        Guidelines for the clinical and economic evaluation of health care technologies.
        Soc Sci Med. 1986; 22: 393-408
        • Grana J
        • Preston S
        • McDermott PD
        • Hanchak NA
        The use of administrative data to risk-stratify asthmatic patients.
        Am J Med Qual. 1997; 12: 113-119
        • Stempel DA
        • Meyer JW
        • Stanford RH
        • Yancey SW
        One year claims analysis comparing inhaled fluticasone propionate with zafirlukast for the treatment of asthma.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001; 107: 94-98
        • Stempel DA
        • Mauskopf J
        • McLaughlin T
        • Yazdani C
        • Stanford RH
        Comparison of asthma costs in patients starting fluticasone propionate compared to patients starting montelukast.
        Respir Med. 2001; 95: 227-234
        • Duan N
        Smearing estimate: a nonparametric retransformation method.
        J Amer Stat Assoc. 1983; 78: 605-610
      2. SAS Procedures Guild. Version 7. SAS Institute, Cary1998
        • Ozminkowski RJ
        • Shaohung W
        • Marder WD
        • Azzolini J
        • Schutt D
        Cost implications for the use of inhaled anti-inflammatory medications in the treatment of asthma.
        Pharmacoeconomics. 2000; 18: 253-254
        • Lozano P
        • Sullivan SD
        • Smith DH
        • Weiss KB
        The economic burden of asthma in US children: estimates from the National Medical Expenditure Survey.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999; 104: 957-963
        • Medispan
        Prescribing Pricing Guide. Medispan, Inc, Indianapolis2000
        • Dubois RW
        • Chawla AJ
        • Neslusan CA
        • Smith MW
        • Wade S
        Explaining drug spending trends: does perception match reality?.
        Health Affairs. 2000; 19: 231-239
        • Horn SD
        Unintended consequences of drug formularies.
        Am J Health-Sys Pharm. 1996; 53: 2204-2206