Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 161, 105844, January 2020

Management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis with shorter treatment regimen in Niger: Nationwide programmatic achievements

Open ArchivePublished:November 23, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2019.105844

      Highlights

      • Countrywide programmatic roll-out shows successful MDR-TB management in Niger.
      • The short treatment regimen resulted in 83·1% % relapse-free success.
      • Successful outcome was not affected by initial resistance to companion drugs.
      • Few patients with relapse or failure cured with bedaquiline-based regimens.
      • Audiometry to switch from injectable to linezolid prevented severe hearing loss.

      Abstract

      Background

      In Niger, the Shorter Treatment Regimen (STR) has been implemented nationwide for rifampicin resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB), since 2008. No previous publication has shown the results from countrywide programmatic implementation using few exclusion criteria, nor exhaustively assessed the effect of initial resistance to companion drugs on outcomes.

      Methods

      The National Tuberculosis Programme and the Damien Foundation conducted a retrospective observational study to evaluate the management of RR-TB from 2008 to 2016. Baseline resistance to drugs was assessed phenotypically, complemented by screening the inhA, katG and pncA genes. Cured patients were followed-up for a period of one year after cure.

      Findings

      Among 1044 patients tested for rifampicin resistance, mainly previously treated patients, 332 were diagnosed with pulmonary RR/TB, 288 were enrolled on treatment and 255 started on STR. Six patients received a modified STR.
      Among 249 patients on standardised STR, 207 (83·1%) were cured relapse-free, eight (3·2%) had failure, 23 (9·2%) died, seven (2·8%) were lost to follow-up and four (1·6%) relapsed.
      The risk of unfavourable outcome was higher in patients with initial resistance to fluoroquinolones (aOR 20·4, 95%CI:5·6–74·6) and very severely underweight (aOR 3·9, 95%CI:1·5–10·1). Successful outcome was not affected by initial resistance to companion drugs. Serious ototoxicity was reported in eight patients (3·2%).

      Interpretation

      A comprehensive nationwide approach to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis management using the STR was feasible and successful. Outcomes were not affected by initial resistance to companion drugs. Our study confirms the effectiveness and safety of the STR.

      Funding

      Damien Foundation and Institute of Tropical Medicine-Antwerp.

      Keywords

      1. Introduction

      Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) threatens effective TB control with an estimated 484,000 new cases harbouring resistance to rifampicin (RR) in 2018. Overall treatment success was 56% according to the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) report [

      World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2019. WHO/CDS/TB/2019.15. Geneva, Switzerland.

      ].
      In 2011, the WHO guidelines recommended a 20-month regimen with an 8-month intensive phase including a second-line injectable (SLI) [

      World Health Organization. Guidelines for the Programmatic Management of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. 2011 Update. WHO/HTM/TB/2011.6. Geneva, Switzerland.

      ].
      Van Deun et al. showed 87·9% relapse-free treatment success using a 9-month gatifloxacin-based regimen in Bangladesh [
      • Van Deun A.
      • Maug A.K.
      • Salim M.A.
      • et al.
      Short, highly effective, and inexpensive standardized treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
      ]. These results were confirmed in a larger cohort in Bangladesh [
      • Aung K.J.
      • Van Deun A.
      • Declercq E.
      • et al.
      Successful “9-month Bangladesh regimen” for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among over 500 consecutive patients.
      ] and also in Niger [
      • Piubello A.
      • Hassane Harouna S.
      • Souleymane M.B.
      • et al.
      High cure rate with standardised short-course multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment in Niger: no relapses.
      ] and Cameroon [
      • Kuaban C.
      • Noeske J.
      • Rieder H.L.
      • Aït-Khaled N.
      • Abena Foe J.L.
      • Trébucq A.
      High effectiveness of a 12-month regimen for MDR-TB patients in Cameroon.
      ], where 12-month regimens were used. A large observational study conducted in Central and West Africa, including Niger, showed 81·6% success [
      • Trébucq A.
      • Schwoebel V.
      • Kashongwe Z.
      • et al.
      Treatment outcome with a short multidrug-resistant tuberculosis regimen in nine African countries.
      ]. Preliminary results coming from this study and other settings together with available published results [
      • Aung K.J.
      • Van Deun A.
      • Declercq E.
      • et al.
      Successful “9-month Bangladesh regimen” for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among over 500 consecutive patients.
      ,
      • Piubello A.
      • Hassane Harouna S.
      • Souleymane M.B.
      • et al.
      High cure rate with standardised short-course multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment in Niger: no relapses.
      ,
      • Kuaban C.
      • Noeske J.
      • Rieder H.L.
      • Aït-Khaled N.
      • Abena Foe J.L.
      • Trébucq A.
      High effectiveness of a 12-month regimen for MDR-TB patients in Cameroon.
      ] informed the 2016 WHO recommendation for the use of a standardised Shorter Treatment Regimen (STR) [

      World Health Organization. WHO Treatment Guidelines for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. 2016 Update. WHO/HTM/TB/2016.04. Geneva, Switzerland.

      ].
      A recent meta-analysis of individual patient data from observational studies informed the 2019 WHO RR/MDR-TB guidelines [

      World Health Organization. WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment. WHO/CDS/TB/2019.3. Geneva, Switzerland.

      ]. The choice is left between the STR, a longer individualised all-oral regimen, depending on the expected effect of individual drugs and all-oral shorter regimens under operational research conditions.
      Niger adopted the STR as operational research in 2008 and as the nationally recommended regimen in 2016. After nine years of implementation, this is the first study to report of the comprehensive approach to countrywide RR/MDR-TB management, including the number of persons tested for RR, diagnosed with RR/MDR-TB, enrolled on treatment, and their treatment outcomes. In addition, we estimate predictors of unfavourable outcome, including the effect of initial resistance to STR companion drugs on outcomes, not yet exhaustively reported.

      2. Methods

      2.1 Design and study population

      This retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the performance of MDR-TB management in Niger, from 2008 to 2016. All patients tested for RR were included.

      2.2 Setting

      Niger is a challenging operational environment. Health staff are scarce, access to care is limited due to long distances between communities and health facilities and security threats. Since 2008, the National Tuberculosis Programme (NTP) and the Damien Foundation (DF) have collaborated closely to provide a comprehensive MDR-TB management.
      DF supplied Second-Line Drugs (SLD), provided transport fees and nutritional support, and assured monitoring and management of Adverse Events (AEs), home visits and family counselling. Medical staff were provided by the DF and NTP and trained by The Union and DF. Career advancements were offered to retain skilled staff.
      Nationwide patients with presumptive MDR-TB were screened, including failures and relapses of retreatment from 2008 to 2014 and all retreatments from 2015 onwards. Since 2008, MDR/RR-TB contacts with presumptive TB were systematically tested. A sputum transportation system from TB facilities to Xpert sites using public transport, allowed a full coverage of the country.

      2.3 Bacteriological investigations

      Sputum specimens were collected before treatment initiation and monthly for smear and culture during treatment. Follow-up after cure continued up to one year after treatment completion with smear and culture performed every 6 months (Table 1). Initially the National TB laboratory in Niamey performed cultures on solid medium and Drug Susceptibility Testing (DST) to diagnose RR/MDR-TB. From October 2013, Xpert® MTB/RIF (Xpert; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) testing was introduced and in 2014, three additional Xpert machines were installed across the country. Second-Line Line Probe Assay (SL-LPA; GenoType MTBDRsl; Hain Lifesciences, Nehren, Germany) testing became available in January 2016.
      Table 1Clinical, bacteriological and laboratory assessment at baseline and during treatment and follow-up.
      Month 0Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6Month 7Month 8Month 9Month 15Month 21
      Clinical assessmentxxxxxxxxxxxx
      Sputum smearxxxxxx
      xx: test performed twice; x(x): test performed twice if the smear of the previous month was positive.
      x(x)
      xx: test performed twice; x(x): test performed twice if the smear of the previous month was positive.
      x(x)
      xx: test performed twice; x(x): test performed twice if the smear of the previous month was positive.
      xxxx
      xx: test performed twice; x(x): test performed twice if the smear of the previous month was positive.
      xx
      Xpert
      Available from October 2013.
      x
      LPA 2nd line
      Available from January 2016.
      x
      Sputum culture
      Performed bimonthly from 2008 to 2010 and monthly from 2011 to 2016.
      xxxxxxxxxxxx
      DST (1st and 2nd line)x
      Chest X Rayxx
      Audiogram
      Available from October 2013.
      xxx
      ECGxxx
      Blood countx
      Blood glucose
      For patients treated with gatifloxacin.
      xxxxxxxxxx
      Serum creatininexxxxx
      Serum potassiumxxxxx
      Serum liver enzymes
      Bimonthly from 2008 to 2010 and monthly from 2011 to 2016.
      xxxxx
      Thyroid Stimulating Hormonexx
      Pregnancy test (female)x
      HIV testx
      a xx: test performed twice; x(x): test performed twice if the smear of the previous month was positive.
      b Available from October 2013.
      c Available from January 2016.
      d Performed bimonthly from 2008 to 2010 and monthly from 2011 to 2016.
      e For patients treated with gatifloxacin.
      f Bimonthly from 2008 to 2010 and monthly from 2011 to 2016.
      To determine the initial resistance profile a posteriori, pre-treatment samples in cetylpyridinium chloride were systematically referred to the Supra-National TB Reference Laboratory of Antwerp for culture and DST (proportion method) for rifampicin, isoniazid, ofloxacin, kanamycin, ethambutol and ethionamide/prothionamide, following the standardised WHO recommended techniques [

      World Health Organization. Guidelines for Surveillance of Drug Resistance in Tuberculosis. 4th Ed. WHO/HTM/TB/2009.422. Geneva, Switzerland.

      ,
      • Global Laboratory Initiative
      GLI Practical Guide to TB Laboratory Strengthening.
      ]. SL-LPA testing and Sanger DNA sequencing were performed from 2012 onwards. Preserved strains were used for genotypic DST, identifying mutations in the inhA, katG and pncA genes [
      • Rigouts L.
      • Coeck N.
      • Gumusboga M.
      • et al.
      Specific gyrA gene mutations predict poor treatment outcome in MDR-TB.
      ].
      Failures and relapses were distinguished from reinfection by comparing the initial with the failure or relapse strain using fingerprinting techniques [
      • Kamerbeek J.
      • Schouls L.
      • Kolik A.
      • et al.
      Simoultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology.
      ].

      2.4 Treatment regimen

      Individuals with confirmed MDR/RR-TB were treated in the three national Units, in Niamey, Maradi and Zinder. The regimens comprised high doses of gatifloxacin, clofazimine, ethambutol and pyrazinamide throughout, supplemented by kanamycin, prothionamide and medium-high doses of isoniazid during the intensive phase, lasting a minimum of 4 months, with a maximum of 6 months, according to sputum smear conversion. The continuation phase lasted eight months between 2008 and 2010 and was shortened to five months from January 2011 onwards, after the publication of Bangladesh results [
      • Van Deun A.
      • Maug A.K.
      • Salim M.A.
      • et al.
      Short, highly effective, and inexpensive standardized treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
      ]. In October 2013 high-dose gatifloxacin was replaced by normal-dose moxifloxacin when gatifloxacin became unavailable on the market (Table 2). Since 2017 high-dose moxifloxacin was used.
      Table 2Daily dosage by weight band, among patients treated with the shorter treatment regimen.
      Drug30–3940–5455–70>70
      Kanamycin
      Used during the intensive phase only (4–6 months, depending of sputum smear conversion).
      0·50·75 g1 g1 g
      Isoniazid (300 mg)
      Used during the intensive phase only (4–6 months, depending of sputum smear conversion).
      11.522
      Prothionamide (250 mg)
      Used during the intensive phase only (4–6 months, depending of sputum smear conversion).
      2234
      Moxifloxacin (400 mg)
      Gatifloxacin 800 mg was used from 2008 to October 2013.
      0·5111
      Clofazimine (50 mg)1
      Clofazimine (100 mg)111
      Ethambutol (400 mg)1·5233·5
      Pyrazinamide (400 mg)2345
      The continuation phase lasted eight months between 2008 and 2010 and was shortened to five months from January 2011 onwards.
      a Used during the intensive phase only (4–6 months, depending of sputum smear conversion).
      b Gatifloxacin 800 mg was used from 2008 to October 2013.
      From October 2015, a modified STR, with linezolid replacing kanamycin during the intensive phase was used in patients with hearing loss on audiometry.

      2.5 Clinical management

      A system to track patients between TB facilities, Xpert sites and MDR-TB Units was set up. Clinically stable patients received ambulatory care with daily directly observed treatment during the intensive phase. Hospital care was offered to patients with severe comorbidities or living more than 5 km from the MDR-TB Units. During the continuation phase, patients living close to facilities continued their attendances whereas patients from further away visited the clinics weekly. Patient education covered issues related to the disease and treatment adherence. Patients’ characteristics, bacteriological follow-up, test results, drug intake and AEs were recorded on national treatment cards.
      Diabetes mellitus was an exclusion criterion for the gatifloxacin-based STR. Patients with corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation beyond 500 ms were excluded from the moxifloxacin-based STR. They were treated with individualised longer regimens, as were patients with previous exposure to SLD or with confirmed resistance to fluoroquinolones and/or SLI at baseline. Having extensive or advanced disease, clinically or on chest X-Ray, was not exclusion criteria for the STR.

      2.6 Monitoring and management of adverse events

      Systematic clinical and laboratory monitoring of patients on treatment was introduced in 2008 (Table 1). AEs were graded according to the National Agency for the Research on AIDS and hepatitis (ANRS) scale [
      Agence nationale de recherche sur le SIDA et les hépatites virales. ANRS scale to grade the severity of adverse events in adults. Version n.1.0-2008 (Translation of the French version n.6 – 2003).
      ]. From 2008 to September 2013, hearing loss was monitored clinically and with audiometry at the end of the intensive phase. Thereafter, bimonthly audiometry has been carried out in all patients given SLIs.
      Ototoxicity was managed by replacing kanamycin with capreomycin from 2008 to 2011, reducing the frequency of kanamycin from daily to thrice a week from 2012 to September 2015 and replacing kanamycin with linezolid from October 2015 onwards. Hearing aids were provided to all patients with moderate to serious hearing loss.
      ECGs were performed at baseline, at week one and one month after treatment initiation to check the QTc interval.

      2.7 Definitions

      The WHO treatment outcome definitions [

      World Health Organization. Definitions and Reporting Framework for Tuberculosis - 2013 Revision, Updated December 2014. WHO/HTM/TB/2013.2. Geneva, Switzerland.

      ] were used except for treatment failure. We defined treatment failure when treatment was terminated or at least two anti-TB drugs were permanently changed due to either a positive culture after ≥ six months of treatment (except for an isolated positive culture), or at least 2 consecutive positive sputum smears with grade ≥ 2 + after ≥ six months of treatment (if cultures were not available) [
      • Schwoebel V.
      • Chiang C.Y.
      • Trébucq A.
      • et al.
      Outcome definitions for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treated with shorter treatment regimens.
      ].
      Relapse was declared if patients had a positive culture during 12-month follow-up after cure or completion, except if molecular tests showed reinfection. Relapse-free cure was declared if patients were cured with no evidence of relapse at the end of the 12-month follow-up.

      2.8 Data management and analysis

      Data were collected from the standardised patient forms and registers and double entered in a database. Inconsistencies were resolved by analysing the source documents.
      We employed univariable and multivariable logistic regression to estimate predictors of unfavourable outcomes of either death, failure, relapse, or lost to follow-up (LTFU). Independent variables included age, gender, HIV status, type of TB, bacillary load, extent of disease, Body Mass Index (BMI), and the initial resistance pattern. Factors associated with outcomes (P-value <0.1) were included in a multivariable model which was simplified by stepwise backwards elimination until all variables had a P-value < 0.05. To have a better understanding of the effect of companion drugs, we repeated the same analysis in patients with fluoroquinolone-susceptible TB. For the latter analysis we excluded those LTFU. Analyses were performed with Stata (Version 14.1, Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX, USA).

      2.9 Ethics

      This study was approved by the Niger National Ethics Committee and by the Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Tropical Medicine of Antwerp, which waived the requirement to obtain informed consent.

      3. Results

      3.1 Patients eligible and analysed for treatment outcome

      Countrywide, from 2008 to 2016, a total of 1044 patients were tested. The proportion of retreatment cases tested increased from 11·2% in 2008 to 42·6% in 2016. A total of 332 patients were diagnosed with pulmonary RR/MDR-TB (Fig. 1). Thirty-two (9·6%) died, 12 (3·6%) were not retrieved before treatment, and 288 (86·7%) started MDR-TB treatment. Of 32 patients who died before starting treatment, ten (31·3%). were diagnosed in 2008. Of 288 patients enrolled on treatment, 33 (11·5%) patients were treated with longer individualised regimens because of previous use of SLD or diabetes mellitus, with a success rate of 69·7%. Six (2·1%) patients were treated with a modified STR because of serious AEs or ototoxicity of any grade at baseline or during treatment. Of these, five (83·3%) were cured and one died.
      Fig. 1
      Fig. 1Patients eligible for second-line treatment with exclusion from enrolment and analysis of the study regimens.
      The remaining 249 (86·5%) were treated with the standardised (unmodified) STR. The median interval between MDR-TB suspicion and treatment start decreased from 138 days (IQR: 50–201) in 2006 to 11 days (IQR: 7–17) in 2016. Their baseline characteristics are shown in Table 3. The median age was 32 years (IQR: 25–40). Most patients were in poor clinical condition at the treatment initiation, with a median BMI of 17·2 kg/m2 (IQR:15·2–19·4). Baseline resistance is shown in Table 3.
      Table 3Baseline patients’ characteristics.
      N%
      Total249100·0
      Gender
      F4317·3
      M20682·7
      Age
      <1872·8
      18–244216·9
      25–349437·8
      35–446526·1
      45–543212·9
      55–6483·2
      ≥6510·4
      Type of patient
      New Case31·2
      Failure17971·9
      Relapse6626·5
      Return after LTFU10·4
      Bacillary load (on SS)
      Low6626·5
      High18373·5
      Extent of disease (on CXR)
      One lung166·4
      Bilateral23393·6
      BMI
      <15 (very severely underweight)5020·1
      15-16 (severely underweight)3915·7
      >16–18·5 (underweight)7329·3
      >18·5 (normal or overweight)8333·3
      Missing41·6
      HIV status
      Negative23092·4
      Positive124·8
      Not tested72·8
      Fluoroquinolone type
      Gatifloxacin11947·8
      Moxifloxacin13052·2
      Resistance to FQ (phenotypic)
      No21485·9
      Yes135·2
      Missing228·8
      Resistance to Km (phenotypic)
      No22791·2
      Missing228·8
      Resistance to H
      No (wild type)52·0
      katG mutation (only)20080·3
      inhA mutation (only)62·4
      katG and inhA mutation145·6
      Phenotypic DST (only)145·6
      Missing104·0
      Resistance to Z – pncA (molecular)
      No (wild type)12249·0
      Yes11044·2
      Missing176·8
      Resistance to E (phenotypic)
      No7228·9
      Yes16265·1
      Missing156·0
      Resistance to Pto (phenotypic)
      No17771·1
      Yes5020·1
      Missing228·8
      F: Female; M: Male; LTFU: Lost to Follow-Up; SS: Sputum Smear; CXR: Chest X-Ray; BMI: Body Mass Index in kg/m2
      FQ: fluoroquinolones; Km: Kanamycin; H: isoniazid; DST: Drug Susceptibility Testing; Z: pyrazinamide; E: ethambutol; Pto: prothionamide.
      Among 28 (11·2%) of 249 patients the intensive phase was extended (15 patients to 5 months and 13 to 6 months).

      3.2 Culture conversion on the standardised STR

      Nine patients died and one was LTFU before having culture conversion. Of the remaining 239 patients, 229 (95·8%) converted at the end of a 4-month intensive phase, three (1·3%) converted on culture at the end of an extended (plus one or two months) intensive phase, and seven (2·9%) remained culture-positive.

      3.3 Treatment outcomes

      Of 249 patients on the standardised STR, 207 (83·1%, 95%CI:78·5–87·8) were cured relapse-free, and 42 had an unfavourable treatment outcome: eight (3·2%) were diagnosed with treatment failure, 23 (9·2%) died, seven (2·8%) were LTFU and four (1·6%) relapsed.
      Among the eight patients with treatment failure, seven never converted and one had culture reversion. A posteriori analysis of the initial resistance profile showed that six had initial resistance to fluoroquinolones (three high-level and three low-level) and two had susceptible strains. Subsequently, five died before they could start a treatment and three patients were cured with bedaquiline-based regimens.
      Of 23 patients who died during treatment, all had extensive and bilateral pulmonary lesions at baseline, 14 were severely underweight and three of them were HIV positive (two were non-adherent to ART). Three patients died because of cerebral malaria and one was diabetic with poor metabolic control.
      Nine patients (39·1%) died during the intensive phase (eight during the first eight treatment weeks) before culture conversion. Fourteen patients (60·9%) died in the continuation phase after bacteriological conversion.
      Seven patients were LTFU, three during the intensive phase and four in the continuation phase. All but one had culture conversion.
      Of 214 patients with fluoroquinolone-susceptible strains, 84·6% were cured relapse-free.
      Most (87·2%) of cured patients had bacteriological documented follow-up one year after cure. Five had a recurrent episode. In one patient the recurrent strain was different than the initial one (thus reinfection). Of four true relapses, three had strains with initial resistance to fluoroquinolone (two high-level and one low-level) while one strain was susceptible at baseline.
      The median interval between treatment completion and relapse was 73·5 days, ranging from 30 to 301 days. All patients with recurrence were afterward treated and cured with bedaquiline-based regimens.
      Seven patients died because of respiratory failure with extensive sequelae. The details on patients’ follow-up after cure are provided in Table 4.
      Table 4Status of cured patients at 6 and 12 months of follow-up.
      6-month follow-up12-month follow-up
      StatusN%N%
      Culture negative18889·117984·8
      Lost to follow-up after treatment146·6209·5
      Died41·973·3
      Relapse41·941·9
      Reinfection (different strain)10·510·5
      Total211100211100

      3.4 Predictors of unfavourable outcomes

      The risk of programmatic unfavourable outcome was significantly higher in patients with initial resistance to fluoroquinolones (69·2% vs. 15·0%; aOR 20·4, 95%CI:5·6–74·6) and very severely underweight (BMI < 15 kg/m2) (30·0% vs. 12·0%; aOR 3·9, 95%CI:1·5–10·1). No significant association was found between outcome and extent of disease, HIV status, initial resistance to isoniazid, ethambutol, pyrazinamide and prothionamide (Table 5).
      Table 5Predictors of a programmatically unfavourable outcome
      Programmatically unfavourable outcome: either death, lost to follow-up, failure or relapse; programmatically favourable outcome: relapse-free cure after 12-months post-treatment follow-up.
      , among 249 MDR/RR-TB patients treated with the standardised Shorter Treatment Regimen.
      TotalProgrammatic favourable outcomeProgrammatic unfavourable outcome
      NN%N%OR[95% CI]p value £aOR[95% CI]p value &
      Total24920783·14216·9
      Gender0·22NA
      F433376·71023·31
      M20617484·53215·50·6[0·3, 1·4]
      Age, median (IQR)32 (25–40)32(25–40)34(27–45)1·3
      For every increase with 10 years.
      [0·9, 1·7]0·14NA
      Type of patient0·13NA
      New Case3266·7133·32·1[0·2, 23·3]
      Failure17914480·43519·61
      Relapse666090·969·10·4[0·2, 1·0]
      Return after LTFU11100·000·0NA
      Bacillary load (on SS)0·66NA
      Low (scanty and 1+)665684·81015·21
      High (2 + and 3+)18315182·53217·51·2[0·5, 2·6]
      Extent of disease (on CXR)0·63NA
      One lung161487·5212·51
      Bilateral23319382·84017·21·5[0·3, 6·6]
      BMI0·0070·001
      <15503570·01530·03·1[1·3, 7·7]3·9[1·5, 10·1]
      15–16393589·7410·30·8[0·2, 2·8]0·8[0·2, 3·1]
      >16–18·5736386·31013·71·2[0·5, 3·0]0·9[0·3, 2·7]
      >18·5837388·01012·011
      Missing4125·0375·021·9[2·1, 231·4]27·4[2·5, 296·2]
      HIV status0·31NA
      Negative23019383·93716·11
      Positive12866·7433·32·6[0·7, 9·1]
      Not tested7685·7114·30·9[0·1, 7·4]
      Fluoroquinolone type0·30NA
      Gatifloxacin11910285·71714·31
      Moxifloxacin13010580·82519·21·4[0·7, 2·8]
      Resistance to FQ (phenotypic)<0·001<0·001
      No21418285·03215·011
      Yes13430·8969·212·8[3·7, 44·1]20·4[5·6, 74·6]
      Missing222195·514·50·3[0·04, 2·1]0·3[0·04, 2·7]
      Resistance to H0·9NA
      No (wild type)55100·000·01
      katG mutation (only)20016482·03618·02·4[0·1, 45·1]
      inhA mutation (only)6583·3116·73·0[0·1, 91·0]
      katG & inhA mutation141392·917·11·2[0·0, 34·9]
      Phenotypic DST (only)141178·6321·43·3[0·1, 76·8]
      Missing10990·0110·01·7[0·1, 50·4]
      Resistance to Z (pncA mutation)0.49NA
      No (wild type)12210182·82117·21
      Yes1109081·82018·21·1[0·5, 2·1]
      Missing171694·115·90·3[0·04, 2·4]
      Resistance to E (phenotypic)0·36NA
      No726286·11013·91
      Yes16213180·93119·11·5[0·7, 3·2]
      Missing151493·316·70·4[0·1, 3·7]
      Resistance to Pto (phenotypic)0·040·14
      No17715084·72715·31
      Yes503672·01428·02·2[1·03, 4·5]
      Missing222195·514·50·3[0·03, 2·0]
      £ variables with p < 0.1 were included in the saturated multivariable regression model.
      & p-values are only shown for variables included in the multivariable regression model. For variables not included we show p = NA (Not Applicable).
      F: Female; M: Male; IQR: Inter Quartile Range; LTFU: Lost To Follow-Up; SS: Sputum Smear; CXR: Chest X-Ray; BMI: Body Mass Index in kg/m2.
      FQ: fluoroquinolones; H: isoniazid; DST: Drug Susceptibility Testing; Z: pyrazinamide; E: ethambutol; Pto: prothionamide.
      a Programmatically unfavourable outcome: either death, lost to follow-up, failure or relapse; programmatically favourable outcome: relapse-free cure after 12-months post-treatment follow-up.
      b For every increase with 10 years.
      Double mutation inhA and katG didn't affect outcomes. On a total of 14 patients, 12 of them with additional resistance to pyrazinamide and one with additional low-level resistance to fluoroquinolones, 13 (92·9%) were cured with no relapse and one died because of septic shock.
      Among patients with confirmed fluoroquinolone-susceptible MDR/RR-TB, the only predictor for having an unfavourable outcome (either death, failure or relapse) was very severe underweight (28·9% vs. 6·0%; aOR 6·4, 95%CI:1·9–21·2) No other significant association was found (Table 6).
      Table 6Predictors of unfavourable outcome (either death, failure or relapse), among 208 MDR/RR-TB fluoroquinolone susceptible patients treated with the standardised Shorter Treatment Regimen.
      TotalFavourable outcomeUnfavourable outcome
      NN%N%OR[95% CI]p value£aOR [95%CI]p value&
      Total20818287·52612·5
      Gender0·080·12
      F383078·9821·11
      M17015289·41810·60·4[0·2, 1·1]
      Age, median (IQR)32 (26–40)32(25–40)35(30–44)1·4
      For every increase with 10 years.
      [0·9, 2·1]0·090·07
      Type of patient0·23NA
      New Case2150·0150·06·3[0·4, 104·8]
      Failure14612686·32013·71
      Relapse595491·558·50·6[0·2, 1·6]
      Return after LTFU11100·000·0NA
      Bacillary load (on SS)0·62NA
      Low (scanty and 1+)484389·6510·41
      High (2 + and 3+)16013986·92113·11·3[0·5, 3·7]
      Extent of disease (on CXR)0·75NA
      One lung131184·6215·41
      Bilateral19517187·72412·30·8[0·2, 3·7]
      BMI<0·001<0·001
      <15453271·11328·96·4[1·9, 21·2]
      aOR not shown as the multivariable model includes only one variable (BMI).
      15–16312993·526·51·1[0·2, 6·3]
      >16–18·5615793·446·61·1[0·3, 4·6]
      >18·5676394·046·01
      Missing4125·0375·047·2[4·0, 564·4]
      HIV status0·32NA
      Negative19116988·52211·51
      Positive11872·7327·32·9[0·7, 11·7]
      Not tested6583·3116·71·5[0·2, 13·8]
      Fluoroquinolone type0·23NA
      Gatifloxacin11110090·1119·91
      Moxifloxacin978284·51515·51·7[0·7, 3·8]
      Resistance to H
      Firth logistic regression was used, as one group had no events.
      0·90NA
      No (wild type)44100·000·01
      katG mutation (only)17715587·62212·41·3[0·1, 25·0]
      inhA mutation (only)5480·0120·03·0[0·1, 95·2]
      katG and inhA mutation111090·919·11·3[0·0, 38·0]
      Phenotypic DST (only)11981·8218·22·4[0·1, 60·3]
      Resistance to Z (pncA mutation)0·11NA
      No (wild type)1119383·81816·21
      Yes938591·488·60·5[0·2, 1·2]
      Missing44100·000·0NA
      Resistance to E (phenotypic)0·95NA
      No635587·3812·71
      Yes14512787·61812·41·0[0·4, 2·4]
      Resistance to Pto (phenotypic)0·60NA
      No16814888·12011·91
      Yes403485·0615·01·3[0·5, 3·5]
      £ variables with p < 0.1 were included in the saturated multivariable regression model.
      & p-values are only shown for variables included in the multivariable regression model. For variables not included we show p = NA (Not Applicable).
      F: Female; M: male; IQR: Inter Quartile Range; LTFU: Lost To Follow-Up; SS: Sputum Smear; CXR: Chest X-Ray; BMI: Body Mass Index in kg/m2.
      H: isoniazid; DST: Drug Susceptibility Testing; Z: pyrazinamide; E: ethambutol; Pto: prothionamide.
      a For every increase with 10 years.
      b aOR not shown as the multivariable model includes only one variable (BMI).
      c Firth logistic regression was used, as one group had no events.
      After excluding patients with treatment failure or relapse and those LTFU, mortality was only associated with very severe underweight (27·1% vs. 3·9%; aOR 10·5, 95%CI:2·7–40·6).

      3.5 Acquisition of resistance

      Of 214 patients with initially fluoroquinolone-susceptible MDR/RR-TB, three (1·4%) acquired high-level fluoroquinolone resistance (two mutations D94G and one D94 N on gyrase A). One had initial resistance to prothionamide and pyrazinamide, one had a strain susceptible to both and one had resistance to prothionamide only. Two patients were underweight and one had normal weight. All three were treated with a moxifloxacin-based STR. There was no acquisition of resistance to fluoroquinolone in patients treated with gatifloxacin.
      Among 227 patients with initial susceptible strains to kanamycin, two (0·9%) developed resistance to the drug. Both had initial resistance to fluoroquinolone (one high-level and one low-level) and were also treated with moxifloxacin.

      3.6 Adverse events

      Most patients (78·7%) had at least one AE, and 5·6% had a serious one (Grade 3–4) (Table 7). None had to stop treatment definitively or to change more than one drug.
      Table 7Frequency and severity of reported adverse effects during treatment according to the most severe effect recorded.
      No AEGrade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4
      TypeN%N%N%N%N%
      Any type5321·37630·510642·683·262·4
      Gastro-intestinal11345·46726·96927·700
      Hepatic16465·96124·5218·420·810·4
      Hearing loss18674·73915·7166·431·252·0
      Renal22791·2187·231·210·40
      Peripheral neuropathy23092·4114·483·200
      Hyperglycaemia
      In 119 patients treated with gatifloxacin.
      11193·365·010·810·80
      Osteoarticular23795·2114·410·400
      Dermatological24297·252·020·800
      Hypothyroidism24498·041·610·400
      a In 119 patients treated with gatifloxacin.
      The most frequent serious AE was ototoxicity, which was reported in eight cases (3·2%) and decreased over time. No patient developed serious hearing loss in 2016, after the introduction of the modified STR with linezolid (Table 8). All patients with ototoxicity were HIV-negative and seven of them had been treated with streptomycin in the past. Six patients with serious ototoxicity were detected through clinical monitoring and audiometry at the end of the intensive phase from 2008 to September 2013 and two through bimonthly audiometry from October 2013 onwards. Hyperglycaemia was recorded in eight patients treated with gatifloxacin. It was manageable with oral antidiabetic drugs, except for one patient for whom gatifloxacin was switched to high-dose levofloxacin. Hyperglycaemia was reversible in all patients after the completion of treatment. No patient developed hypoglycaemia. Among subjects treated with moxifloxacin, one QTc prolongation (>500 ms) without symptoms was recorded and reverted after correction of hypokalaemia. No other QTc disorders were reported.
      Table 8Proportion and severity of hearing loss in 249 patients with unmodified STR at the end of the intensive phase, stratified according with the strategy of detection and management.
      StrategiesPeriodPatientsNo

      Hearing loss
      Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4
      NN%N%N%N%N%
      Clinical monitoring of hearing loss and audiometry at the end of the intensive phase.

      If hearing loss, kanamycin replaced by capreomycin or frequency of kanamycin reduced from daily to thrice-weekly.
      2008–Sept/20131199781·58
      Mild hearing loss may have been underestimated as audiometry was performed at the end of the intensive phase only for patients with clinical signs of ototoxicity in this period.
      6·7
      Mild hearing loss may have been underestimated as audiometry was performed at the end of the intensive phase only for patients with clinical signs of ototoxicity in this period.
      86·721·743·4
      Bimonthly audiometry.

      If hearing loss, frequency of kanamycin reduced from daily to thrice-weekly.
      Oct/2013–Sept/2015744763·51925·768·111·411·4
      Bimonthly audiometry.

      If hearing loss, kanamycin replaced by linezolid.


      Oct/2015–2016
      564275·01221·423·60
      Severe hearing loss (Grade 3) was detected in two patients having been switched to a modified STR with linezolid in the last quarter of 2015. Both patients were switched after the development of a Grade 2. From 2016 onwards, all patients with a hearing loss of Grade 1 were switched to linezolid.
      0
      a Mild hearing loss may have been underestimated as audiometry was performed at the end of the intensive phase only for patients with clinical signs of ototoxicity in this period.
      b Severe hearing loss (Grade 3) was detected in two patients having been switched to a modified STR with linezolid in the last quarter of 2015. Both patients were switched after the development of a Grade 2. From 2016 onwards, all patients with a hearing loss of Grade 1 were switched to linezolid.
      Ethambutol was stopped in one patient due to optic neuritis in the continuation phase. He had been treated with ethambutol for 20 months before STR initiation.
      Mild or moderate gastro-intestinal disorders were frequent (54·6%), appeared within a median of one month (IQR: 1–2), were manageable with food intake and anti-emetic drugs (metoclopramide and ondansetron). Serious hepatic disorders were recorded in three patients and one of them had also hepatitis C and died. Other minor AEs were rare, mild to moderate and subsided after the completion of treatment.
      Six patients were excluded in the final treatment outcome analysis because they received a modified STR. For one, ethambutol was stopped and replaced with cycloserine because of optic neuritis during the intensive phase. This patient had undergone several first-line treatments in the past with a total of 32-months of ethambutol. One patient had severe Achilles’ tendonitis. The fluoroquinolone was stopped and replaced by linezolid as bedaquiline was unavailable at that time. He was cured. Three patients had moderate to severe ototoxicity during treatment and kanamycin was replaced by linezolid. One patient had moderate hearing loss at baseline and was started on a modified STR where the injectable was replaced with linezolid. None had Grade 4 hearing loss at the end of treatment.

      4. Discussion

      This is a population-based study assessing countrywide management of MDR/RR-TB with the STR over a period of nine years. Moreover, we show comprehensive data on the effect of initial resistance to companion drugs included in the STR on outcomes, not exhaustively previously reported.
      During programmatic implementation in a challenging setting, nine out of ten patients were treated with the unmodified STR, obtaining a high relapse-free cure (83·1%). Most of patients had an initial resistance profile and records of bacteriological follow-up to 12 months after cure. Initial resistance to fluoroquinolones was strongly associated with unfavourable outcomes. However, initial resistance to the companion drugs (isoniazid, ethambutol, pyrazinamide and prothionamide), did not affect the outcomes. SLI resistance was absent in this setting.
      Our results are consistent with the 78·8% success rate obtained with the STR in the STREAM trial, stage 1, the world's first randomised phase III clinical trial on MDR-TB which showed that the STR was non-inferior to longer individualised regimens with a duration of 20–24 months [
      • Nunn A.J.
      • Phillips P.P.J.
      • Meredith S.K.
      • et al.
      A trial of a shorter regimen for rifampin-resistant tuberculosis.
      ]. Our findings are also consistent with the 81·6% success rate reported by an observational study conducted in programmatic conditions in nine African countries [
      • Trébucq A.
      • Schwoebel V.
      • Kashongwe Z.
      • et al.
      Treatment outcome with a short multidrug-resistant tuberculosis regimen in nine African countries.
      ].
      A meta-analysis of individual patient data from observational studies informed the current WHO guidelines [

      World Health Organization. WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment. WHO/CDS/TB/2019.3. Geneva, Switzerland.

      ]. There are three approaches to treat RR-TB. First, an individualised all-oral longer regimen, combining the most effective individual drugs identified by the meta-analysis with a conditional recommendation based on a very low certainty in the estimate of effect. Second, the STR, based on a conditional recommendation with a low certainty in the estimate of effect. Third, an all-oral shorter regimen under operational research conditions. The meta-analysis showed that the STR was associated with a higher proportion of programmatic success, mainly explained by a statistically significant lower proportion of LTFU, but suggested a higher risk of failure and relapse in the presence of resistance to companion drugs in patients with fluoroquinolone and SLI-susceptible MDR-TB [

      World Health Organization. WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment. WHO/CDS/TB/2019.3. Geneva, Switzerland.

      ].
      Our data do not support this finding. In patients with fluoroquinolone-susceptible MDR/RR-TB, we found a very low incidence of failure/relapse, even though the initial resistance to the companion drugs was frequent. Some of our patients had high-level resistance to isoniazid combined with resistance to prothionamide (double mutation inhA and katG). Moreover, phenotypic DST for ethambutol and thioamides is not reliable and poorly reproducible [

      World Health Organization. Technical Manual for Drug Susceptibility Testing of Medicines Used in the Treatment of Tuberculosis. WHO/CDS/TB/2018.24. Geneva, Switzerland.

      ]. Although the detection of mutations in the inhA gene to establish the resistance to thioamides may be feasible in the field [
      • Morlock G.P.
      • Metchock B.
      • Sikes D.
      • Crawford J.T.
      • Cooksey R.C.
      ethA, inhA, and katG loci of ethionamide-resistant clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates.
      ], ethA mutations can only be tested using DNA sequencing [
      • Brossier F.
      • Veziris N.
      • Truffot-Pernot C.
      • Jarlier V.
      • Sougakoff W.
      Molecular investigation of resistance to the antituberculous drug ethionamide in multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
      ].
      Studies showing higher failure/relapse rates in patients treated with the STR were conducted in settings with a high prevalence of initial resistance to SLD [
      • Ahmad Khan F.
      • Salim M.A.H.
      • du Cros P.
      • et al.
      Effectiveness and safety of standardised shorter regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: individual patient data and aggregate data meta-analyses.
      ]. In such settings patients need a baseline molecular test to identify resistance to fluoroquinolones. However, as the pooled sensitivity of the direct SL-LPA is 86·2% [
      • Theron G.
      • Peter J.
      • Richardson M.
      • Warren R.
      • Dheda K.
      • Steingart K.R.
      GenoType® MTBDRsl assay for resistance to second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs.
      ], initial hetero-resistance to fluoroquinolone may be missed. Relying on a posteriori determination of initial resistance (before the implementation of SL-LPA), our data showed that the strongest predictor of unfavourable outcome was fluoroquinolone resistance. Therefore, missed initial resistance to fluoroquinolone, the core drug of the STR, may explain higher failure/relapse rates shown.
      Acquisition of resistance to fluoroquinolones was very uncommon. Acquired resistance was identified in three patients treated with the moxifloxacin-based STR, and in none of the patients treated with the gatifloxacin-based STR. Indeed, gatifloxacin is associated with a lower risk of failure, relapse and acquisition of resistance [
      • Van Deun A.
      • Decroo T.
      • Kuaban C.
      • et al.
      Gatifloxacin is superior to levofloxacin and moxifloxacin in shorter treatment regimens for MDR-TB.
      ].
      Since 2012, when bedaquiline became available in Niger, we have applied the principle of 'cascade of regimens' [
      • Van Deun A.
      • Decroo T.
      • Piubello A.
      • de Jong B.C.
      • Lynen L.
      • Rieder H.L.
      Principles for constructing a tuberculosis treatment regimen: the role and definition of core and companion drugs.
      ], meaning that after an unsuccessful fluoroquinolone-based STR, seven patients were enrolled on a bedaquiline-based regimen with a 100% cure.
      All patients who died presented with a poor clinical condition at diagnosis. Severe underweight was an important predictor of mortality, consistent with findings from other settings [
      • Lai H.H.
      • Lai Y.J.
      • Yen Y.F.
      Association of Body Mass Index with timing of death during tuberculosis treatment.
      ,
      • Kurbatova E.V.
      • Taylor A.
      • Gammino V.M.
      • et al.
      Predictors of poor outcomes among patients treated for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis at DOTS-plus projects.
      ]. We speculate that reducing the delay in treatment initiation will decrease mortality in the future [
      • Ngabonziza J.C.
      • Habimana Y.
      • Decroo T.
      • et al.
      Reduction of diagnostic and treatment delays reduces rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis mortality in Rwanda.
      ].
      We provide a detailed description of AEs in a real-life setting. The STR proved to be safe, with 5·6% of patients developing serious AEs. Although mild hearing loss have may been underestimated because of the unavailability of systematic audiometry until 2013, the cumulative rate of serious ototoxicity was low (3·2%), with no serious hearing loss detected from 2016 to date. Several factors may have contributed to this decrease, such as the earlier detection of RR-TB and thus shorter exposure to the streptomycin-based regimen, the systematic monitoring with audiometry since October 2013, and the switch from the injectable to linezolid when audiometry abnormalities were detected.
      Our study was conducted in a setting with a low prevalence of resistance to fluoroquinolones and SLI limiting the generalization of our findings.
      Although our study was not documented with the rigor of a clinical trial, we believe that its programme embeddedness is in fact a strength.

      5. Conclusion

      Our results show that a comprehensive approach to RR/MDR-TB diagnosis and management is feasible and can be can be implemented with good treatment outcomes even in resource-limited settings. The treatment outcomes were not affected by initial resistance to the companion drugs used in the standardised STR. Our study confirms the effectiveness and the safety of the STR on the long run and complements the report on its efficacy documented by the STREAM trial.

      Funding

      This work was funded by Damien Foundation, Brussels, Belgium. The Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium, contributed with bacteriological investigations.

      Authors contributions

      AP wrote the study protocol, supervised the study and wrote the first draft; MBS and SHH conducted the study, supervised the data collection and quality control; TD conducted the data analysis with contributions of AY, NOG and AR; MMA, IML, SA, BM, AS and AGI conducted the study; PL, MG, ZHH, JD and BdJ conducted the laboratory tests; SM and AVD verified the methods and the results; all authors contributed to the final manuscript.

      Declaration of competing interest

      The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

      Acknowledgements

      We thank the Damien Foundation staff in Niger (Soumaila Morou, Ibrahim Boukari, Rekia Mamane, Tahirou Moussa, Issa Siradji) and in Belgium for the excellent logistic and technical support provided. We are grateful to the Ministry of Public Health of Niger and to all the NTP Coordinators and to the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory of Niamey for the continuous support. A special thanks to Clare Pierard, Rosella Bigoni-Garcia, Laura Eickoff and Riitta Dlodlo who provided language help and to Valérie Schwoebel, Arnaud Trébucq and Nadia Aït-Khaled for their valuable technical inputs.

      References

      1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2019. WHO/CDS/TB/2019.15. Geneva, Switzerland.

      2. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the Programmatic Management of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. 2011 Update. WHO/HTM/TB/2011.6. Geneva, Switzerland.

        • Van Deun A.
        • Maug A.K.
        • Salim M.A.
        • et al.
        Short, highly effective, and inexpensive standardized treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
        Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2010; 182: 684-692https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201001-0077OC
        • Aung K.J.
        • Van Deun A.
        • Declercq E.
        • et al.
        Successful “9-month Bangladesh regimen” for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among over 500 consecutive patients.
        Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2014; 18: 1180-1187https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.14.0100
        • Piubello A.
        • Hassane Harouna S.
        • Souleymane M.B.
        • et al.
        High cure rate with standardised short-course multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment in Niger: no relapses.
        Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2014; 18: 1188-1194https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.13.0075
        • Kuaban C.
        • Noeske J.
        • Rieder H.L.
        • Aït-Khaled N.
        • Abena Foe J.L.
        • Trébucq A.
        High effectiveness of a 12-month regimen for MDR-TB patients in Cameroon.
        Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2015; 19: 517-524https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.14.0535
        • Trébucq A.
        • Schwoebel V.
        • Kashongwe Z.
        • et al.
        Treatment outcome with a short multidrug-resistant tuberculosis regimen in nine African countries.
        Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2018; 22: 17-25https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.17.0498
      3. World Health Organization. WHO Treatment Guidelines for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. 2016 Update. WHO/HTM/TB/2016.04. Geneva, Switzerland.

      4. World Health Organization. WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment. WHO/CDS/TB/2019.3. Geneva, Switzerland.

      5. World Health Organization. Guidelines for Surveillance of Drug Resistance in Tuberculosis. 4th Ed. WHO/HTM/TB/2009.422. Geneva, Switzerland.

        • Global Laboratory Initiative
        GLI Practical Guide to TB Laboratory Strengthening.
        2017
        • Rigouts L.
        • Coeck N.
        • Gumusboga M.
        • et al.
        Specific gyrA gene mutations predict poor treatment outcome in MDR-TB.
        J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016; 71: 314-323https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv360
        • Kamerbeek J.
        • Schouls L.
        • Kolik A.
        • et al.
        Simoultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology.
        J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997; 35: 907-914
      6. Agence nationale de recherche sur le SIDA et les hépatites virales. ANRS scale to grade the severity of adverse events in adults. Version n.1.0-2008 (Translation of the French version n.6 – 2003).
        (Accessed October 2013. [French])
      7. World Health Organization. Definitions and Reporting Framework for Tuberculosis - 2013 Revision, Updated December 2014. WHO/HTM/TB/2013.2. Geneva, Switzerland.

        • Schwoebel V.
        • Chiang C.Y.
        • Trébucq A.
        • et al.
        Outcome definitions for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treated with shorter treatment regimens.
        Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2019; 23: 619-624https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.18.0798
        • Nunn A.J.
        • Phillips P.P.J.
        • Meredith S.K.
        • et al.
        A trial of a shorter regimen for rifampin-resistant tuberculosis.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 2019; 380: 1201-1213https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1811867
      8. World Health Organization. Technical Manual for Drug Susceptibility Testing of Medicines Used in the Treatment of Tuberculosis. WHO/CDS/TB/2018.24. Geneva, Switzerland.

        • Morlock G.P.
        • Metchock B.
        • Sikes D.
        • Crawford J.T.
        • Cooksey R.C.
        ethA, inhA, and katG loci of ethionamide-resistant clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates.
        Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003; 47: 3799-3805
        • Brossier F.
        • Veziris N.
        • Truffot-Pernot C.
        • Jarlier V.
        • Sougakoff W.
        Molecular investigation of resistance to the antituberculous drug ethionamide in multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
        Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011; 55: 355-360https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01030-10
        • Ahmad Khan F.
        • Salim M.A.H.
        • du Cros P.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness and safety of standardised shorter regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: individual patient data and aggregate data meta-analyses.
        Eur. Respir. J. 2017; 50: 1700061https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00061-2017
        • Theron G.
        • Peter J.
        • Richardson M.
        • Warren R.
        • Dheda K.
        • Steingart K.R.
        GenoType® MTBDRsl assay for resistance to second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs.
        Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016; Sep 8; 9: CD010705
        • Van Deun A.
        • Decroo T.
        • Kuaban C.
        • et al.
        Gatifloxacin is superior to levofloxacin and moxifloxacin in shorter treatment regimens for MDR-TB.
        Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2019; 23: 965-971https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.19.0053
        • Van Deun A.
        • Decroo T.
        • Piubello A.
        • de Jong B.C.
        • Lynen L.
        • Rieder H.L.
        Principles for constructing a tuberculosis treatment regimen: the role and definition of core and companion drugs.
        Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2018; 22: 239-245https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.17.0660
        • Lai H.H.
        • Lai Y.J.
        • Yen Y.F.
        Association of Body Mass Index with timing of death during tuberculosis treatment.
        PLoS One. 2017; 12e0170104https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170104
        • Kurbatova E.V.
        • Taylor A.
        • Gammino V.M.
        • et al.
        Predictors of poor outcomes among patients treated for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis at DOTS-plus projects.
        Tuberculosis. 2012; 92: 397-403https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2012.06.003
        • Ngabonziza J.C.
        • Habimana Y.
        • Decroo T.
        • et al.
        Reduction of diagnostic and treatment delays reduces rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis mortality in Rwanda.
        Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2019; (in press)